The unofficial and offical charts are both lying. The GitHub one ignores actual outages and the unofficial ones count minor display bugs in minor features as a “github outage”.
Looks nice, but I just can’t imagine the use case where you care about security enough to encrypt a file, but not enough that you trust a random website with it.
I see the point, keep in mind encryption etc all runs client side. would obviously never recommend to encrypt anything sensetive or critical on a website :D
While that's all well and good. The problem is a website can update it's code every time you load it. So while the user can audit nothing is being sent, they would have to do this every time they load it.
While I think the UI is super nice here. I'd personally stick to a trusted tool from an org and project with a good reputation and long history.
There’s a Kmart near me that I sometimes walk around when it’s raining outside. Even though it’s not endless like outside, the tall isles block your sight lines so you can wander for a while.
but sometimes I need a little burst of the phone/music to serve as a distraction and force me to unplug from the hard problem that i'm fixated on. once i've successfully started thinking about something else, phone/music off and let the productive mind wandering begin
It's funny how in the past a server uptime used to be a kind of badge of honor, while now a computer running for more than a week is a massive security risk.
I've had to be on top of updating everything constantly lately.
I tried to get started with programming with books. But I just didn't seem to be getting anything, I'd read the chapters and not really learn or understand it. What really worked was interactive education like Codecademy and some others I have forgotten the name of.
Reading a small paragraph and then immediately putting it in to action made everything clear far better than books did.
It's fascinating the different ways human minds work and learn. I'm the same way.
It also shows up in other areas like language learning where some people prefer classes and grammar books, and others prefer to just learn via exposure to a lot of content.
I think this is probably just the common experience. Programming is probably best learned hands on rather than through a book, which is why the use of programming books has fallen off a cliff once we got other options. Even before AI I think programming books had already fallen off in popularity.
There would be some things books can provide that are probably better than other options, but for a lot of hands on skills it seems best to learn in a hands on way.
I used to read a constant stream of magazines before such books became more widely available, and then just read the books and knew the language. I could read APL after reading a pick and write C after reading the book.
Different people learn differently and not everyone needs to type something in to learn it.
Maybe, I haven't looked into it too much, but among the people with a preference for classroom and textbook based learning there does seem to be a large degree of fear of failure, which influences what might otherwise be a different natural preference. Fear of failure is exacerbated by making mistakes in public, but it seems to even apply when nobody is there to observe someone making mistakes.
At work we had a dispute over if AI should be allowed in the technical interview, we resolved it by both running an AI allowed and not allowed interview. Something interesting we found is that every candidate either passed or failed both. People who could not program manually without AI were not able to get the agent to complete the tasks either.
I've seen people type questions in to the LLM and get the answer they asked for but not the one they needed/wanted because they didn't have the correct terminology.
Both before my time. These days it seems like every site is able to withstand pretty much every controversy. Facebook should have died about 5 times by now but the company is as strong as ever.
It is pretty simple and standardized. The spec sheet will list the cooling and heating output in kW, and then also the input in kW. The number they have displayed most prominently is the cooling output while the others will be in the specs.
reply